Dawn Mellor originally studied fine art at St Martins in the Field, London, and later, was admitted to the Royal College of Art to complete her BA (Hons) degree. Dawn then studied and obtained her Masters degree at the RCA.
PLEASE NOTE; THE IMAGES BELOW ARE RECREATED WITH DAWN'S KIND PERMISSION (RECEIVED VERBALLY FOLLOWING THIS LECTURE), FOR MY ACADEMIC RESEARCH DURING MY DEGREE STUDIES. PLEASE DO NOT COPY OR RE-DISTRIBUTE.
Dawn's work generally looks at figures from public life. She has created a series on celebrity and stardom, but instead of focusing on the glory and fame that celebrity produces, she focuses on the darker side of these characters.
For example of exhibition of 'The Conspirators' was actually based on figures of the elite in the art world.
Another exhibition entitled "The Actress" is about Helen Mirren, but instead of looking at the "hopeful aristocratic" side that Helen seems to publicly aspire to, it actually looks at the somewhat degenerative "Soho based" side of her earlier works as an aspiring actress during her early works.
Helen Mirren has also played as the Queen and as Rosalind as well as Salange on stage, and various other archetypal female roles too, such as in the Prime Suspect series (for television) where she plays an orthodox role of 'the female detective'. - Dawn cleverly "redressed" Helen Mirren's character and re-clothed her up, as the French Maid 'Salange' from her early works during an original stage career début as an actress in Southend. The fantasy of murder in the play, is also manipulated in Dawn's art work. In particular, it is interesting that Helen Mirren seems in public to have an appearance and 'air' of a condescending attitude to background and her attitude towards Southend. This is really brought forward in Dawn's paintings, and levels an identity to show that Helen is not actually from the aristocracy after all, that is at complete odds to perhaps the image portrayed to the public.
Dawn was keen to point out that she doesn't dislike Helen in anyway, but just wanted to create her image as an alter ego and which, is completely fictitious.
Race riots and economic deprivation, and the overuse of police control on the disorder, (where lots of social commentary from an out of touch elite was also being generated), was blamed on these "nasty videos", and the "Video Nasties" was the biggest story of the day.
So, enters Dawn, and her brilliant sketch book of Portraits, completed at a very early age and now turned in to abook in it's own right....
- In essence, by drawing Michael Jackson and other black celebrities (where Dawn only had access to their images at that time, through newspaper and magazine articles); Dawn was trying to represent a view of apartheid and was extremely angry at the fact that apartheid and 'celebritization' was actually making money from the abuse of these black celebrities.
At this tender age around 13-16, she was trying to make sense of all of this. But now, much later in her life, Dawn is perhaps now realising "it was more about her own ignorance of what was going on at the time" in her own mind, than in the ambiguity of Michael Jackson's innocence - on the one side, and his criminal perversions and displaced sexual repression (as we all found out much later) on the other. (Dawn also mentioned in the lecture, - "that around then, [she] fancied Diana Ross too at that time", and I thoroughly applaud and support her for being so honest to all us in the lecture hall), but Michael Jackson had a cultural greatness for "black celebrity" at that time which was far greater.
Dawn also mentioned that at that adolescent age [13-16 or so], she had made drawings of other male pin-ups, that she used to make connections with and in order to help her mix with other girls. (It was interesting to hear Dawn explain that this wonderful use of her drawing skills was sometimes used as a vehicle to "overcome"... (I detect with some really human shyness), as she put it, as a result of perhaps ..."her mixed up sexually repressed feelings" of making friends with other girls.
Dawn's process of making portraiture, but then by adding some sort of 'visceral' layer [visceral was a word used by on of our lecturers, - and it is generally used to describe something akin to the outside layer of a bodily organ], which tends to be added after the original portrait and accurate likenesses been obtained, is extremely interesting. Dawn answered the question directly in that "the added layer of visceral imagery is not an inbuilt or felt hatred, it is something very different, - almost childish" as she put it.
In reflection, I found that Dawn's honesty and courage in her work was incredibly interesting and her comments highly articulate, - I thoroughly enjoyed her lecture with the hope of meeting her again sometime. - Not only is her work readily very skilful at an artistic level, but it also has a humour injected into the subject matter (which, while some people may find offensive, I found very skillful, clever and genuine). My in-depth reflection of this is that I think much of Dawn's work is intended to be used as a parody and as mild humour, it opens up another angle, new questions and challenges the status quo, - which I particularly liked. - Nobody who has an adult, mature and open mind should be offended at all by any of her works. She deserves the popularity and continued success for a very long time to come.
PLEASE NOTE; THE IMAGES ABOVE ARE RECREATED WITH DAWN'S KIND PERMISSION (RECEIVED VERBALLY FOLLOWING THIS LECTURE), FOR THIS, MY ACADEMIC RESEARCH BLOG, DURING MY DEGREE STUDIES. PLEASE DO NOT COPY OR RE-DISTRIBUTE THEREFORE.
No comments:
Post a Comment